"When I look back at the historical role and the historical manifestations on Pan-Kmtywism, I deal with the first organized society in the Nile Valley, when the people of the South and the North came together to form a country now known to the world as Egypt. The unification of the Upper and Lower Nile was an act of Pan-Kmtywism, putting a portion of Kmt together for the whole of Kmt to be together." [Mhenga John Henrik Clarke]
(https://fb-s-a-a.akamaihd.net/h-ak-xaf1/v/t31.0-0/p480x480/17310033_1378606032199990_2966867774168325213_o.jpg?oh=632e15b5e1f1497850a5830a6db77550&oe=596B2B1B&__gda__=1498891571_9fca729e638d7f3e9b77faca3c7f0eee)
(https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/17362694_1378606028866657_6002091218856971567_n.jpg?oh=1e9738b18aff22534c5633149f558306&oe=596CFC63)
(https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/17425955_1378606038866656_8239460892683840766_n.jpg?oh=d6950f91d3468f63447cda3400d0c4c5&oe=59612EB2)
(https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/17426169_1378606132199980_1195765796386401071_n.jpg?oh=da496f82b14c57e4cd6a5ccf0161e65f&oe=59715509)
(https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/17308832_1378606135533313_6632944133620335912_n.jpg?oh=1efcbd2112626399198226a40a201f6a&oe=59251BAC)
The last pic is Bess correct?
-------------------------------------------
The oppressed, having internalized the image of the oppressor and adopted his guidelines, are fearful of freedom.
Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
Dukuzumurenyi;225586 wrote: "When I look back at the historical role and the historical manifestations on Pan-Kmtywism, I deal with the first organized society in the Nile Valley, when the people of the South and the North came together to form a country now known to the world as Egypt. The unification of the Upper and Lower Nile was an act of Pan-Kmtywism, putting a portion of Kmt together for the whole of Kmt to be together." [Mhenga John Henrik Clarke]
(https://fb-s-a-a.akamaihd.net/h-ak-xaf1/v/t31.0-0/p480x480/17310033_1378606032199990_2966867774168325213_o.jpg?oh=632e15b5e1f1497850a5830a6db77550&oe=596B2B1B&__gda__=1498891571_9fca729e638d7f3e9b77faca3c7f0eee)
(https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/17362694_1378606028866657_6002091218856971567_n.jpg?oh=1e9738b18aff22534c5633149f558306&oe=596CFC63)
(https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/17425955_1378606038866656_8239460892683840766_n.jpg?oh=d6950f91d3468f63447cda3400d0c4c5&oe=59612EB2)
(https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/17426169_1378606132199980_1195765796386401071_n.jpg?oh=da496f82b14c57e4cd6a5ccf0161e65f&oe=59715509)
(https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/17308832_1378606135533313_6632944133620335912_n.jpg?oh=1efcbd2112626399198226a40a201f6a&oe=59251BAC)
This is the first quote in my forthcoming book.
Sent from my Uhuru Note using Abibitumi Kasa mobile app (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Obadele Kambon;225638 wrote: This is the first quote in my forthcoming book.
Sent from my Uhuru Note using Abibitumi Kasa mobile app (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Heard you say you're up at 3 am writing these days.
-------------------------------------------
The oppressed, having internalized the image of the oppressor and adopted his guidelines, are fearful of freedom.
Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
Kemet was not "Pan Kmtywism".
It was a confederation and empire based on cornering the market of the Nile River and sea ports.
There is no definition of "Pan Kmtywism" that fits Kemet. Was Kush also a Pan Kmtyw civilization then?
Why were these two Pan Kmtyw countries fighting? This quote is ridiculous revisionist history. Kemet was a federation that is glorified but other Black Aboriginal federations are relegated to being "backwards uncivilized tribes".
Kemet had no concept of being "Kmtyw" and was as "Pan Kmtyw" as Dahomey, Asanti, Zimbabwe, Kush, the various Yoruba empires. That quote is throwing shade at other Black indigenous civilizations to say Kemet had race consciousness when they didn't. That's why they intermarried with white foreginers, assimilated white foreigners while fighting with other Black civilizations and fighting over control of religious temples and territories.
Kemet may have originally been a large confederation of many smaller Black Aboriginal tribes and states HOWEVER to call Kemet "Pan Kmtyw" is gross. It just shows the term "Pan Kmtyw" has contradictory definitions!
Ekwensu007;225691 wrote: Kemet was not "Pan Kmtywism".
It was a confederation and empire based on cornering the market of the Nile River and sea ports.
There is no definition of "Pan Kmtywism" that fits Kemet. Was Kush also a Pan Kmtyw civilization then?
Why were these two Pan Kmtyw countries fighting? This quote is ridiculous revisionist history. Kemet was a federation that is glorified but other Black Aboriginal federations are relegated to being "backwards uncivilized tribes".
Kemet had no concept of being "Kmtyw" and was as "Pan Kmtyw" as Dahomey, Asanti, Zimbabwe, Kush, the various Yoruba empires. That quote is throwing shade at other Black indigenous civilizations to say Kemet had race consciousness when they didn't. That's why they intermarried with white foreginers, assimilated white foreigners while fighting with other Black civilizations and fighting over control of religious temples and territories.
Kemet may have originally been a large confederation of many smaller Black Aboriginal tribes and states HOWEVER to call Kemet "Pan Kmtyw" is gross. It just shows the term "Pan Kmtyw" has contradictory definitions!
Would care to share your definition of Pan-Kmtywism?
-------------------------------------------
The oppressed, having internalized the image of the oppressor and adopted his guidelines, are fearful of freedom.
Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPKaiC1wYww&feature=share (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPKaiC1wYww&feature=share)
-------------------------------------------
The oppressed, having internalized the image of the oppressor and adopted his guidelines, are fearful of freedom.
Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
kevlew;225679 wrote: Heard you say you're up at 3 am writing these days.
-------------------------------------------
The oppressed, having internalized the image of the oppressor and adopted his guidelines, are fearful of freedom.
Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
I'm up at 3am writing right now.
Ekwensu007;225691 wrote: Kemet was not "Pan Kmtywism".
It was a confederation and empire based on cornering the market of the Nile River and sea ports.
There is no definition of "Pan Kmtywism" that fits Kemet. Was Kush also a Pan Kmtyw civilization then?
Why were these two Pan Kmtyw countries fighting? This quote is ridiculous revisionist history. Kemet was a federation that is glorified but other Black Aboriginal federations are relegated to being "backwards uncivilized tribes".
Kemet had no concept of being "Kmtyw" and was as "Pan Kmtyw" as Dahomey, Asanti, Zimbabwe, Kush, the various Yoruba empires. That quote is throwing shade at other Black indigenous civilizations to say Kemet had race consciousness when they didn't. That's why they intermarried with white foreginers, assimilated white foreigners while fighting with other Black civilizations and fighting over control of religious temples and territories.
Kemet may have originally been a large confederation of many smaller Black Aboriginal tribes and states HOWEVER to call Kemet "Pan Kmtyw" is gross. It just shows the term "Pan Kmtyw" has contradictory definitions!
I'd advise you to look up the 7 objectives of the 1900 Pan-Kmtyw Conference to see which one of them would rule out Kemet. You can find this information in Chinweizu's work on Pan-Kmtywism Revisited. The various other examples that you gave would also qualify as they bring together Kmtyw=Black people under one umbrella politically, socially, economically, militarily, etc. The main difference is that Kemet means Black People and Land of Black People (depending on the determinative). Also, you've lumped 3,000+ years into uninformed generalizations. The fighting and diplomacy with other Kmtyw=Black civilizations were both to bring in more Kmtyw=Black people and more land of Black people. The question you need to be asking is how did we go from the following text from the Autobiography of Weni to intermarriage and assimilation. When you get to researching rather than generalizing, you'll find two major events that ultimately led to these much later issues and ultimately the destruction of Black Civilization. At any rate, here are a few quotes you or others reading this thread might find interesting.
ḫsf.
n ḥm=f ḫt
n ˁȝm(y)w ḥryw šˁyoppose to majesty=3SG thing to Eureurasian.PL upon.PL sand
‘When his majesty took action against the Eureurasian Sand-dwellers,’
ỉr n hm=f mšˁ n ḏbȝw ˁšȝw m šmˁwmake.to majesty=3SG army to 30,000 many.PL in Upper Kmt
his majesty made an army of many tens of thounited snakesnds from all of Upper Kemet:
mỉ ḳd=f ḫnt ȝbyw mḥty mdnyt like extent=3SG.POSS South Abyw North Medenyt
from Yebu in the south to Medenyt in the north
m tȝ mḥw m gswy pr mỉ ḳd sn in Lower Kmt in sides house like extent 3PL
from Lower Egypt: from all of the Two-Sides-of-the-House […]’
m Sḏr m ḫn(w) Sḏrw m ỉrṯt Nḥsywin Sedjer in Khen-Sedjru in Irtjet Nubians
and from Sedjer and Khen-sedjru; and from Irtjet-Nubians,
Mḏȝw Nḥsyw ỉȝm Nḥsyw‘Medja-Nubians, Yam-Nubians,’
m Wȝwȝt Nḥsyw m Kȝw NḥsywWawat-Nubians, Kaau-Nubians;
m tȝ ṯȝmin land Tjemeh
and from Tjemeh-land.[1] (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/#_ftn1)
[1] (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/#_ftnref1)Lichtheim,
Ancient Egyptian Literature: A Book of Readings, Vol. I; the Old and Middle Kingdoms., p. 19.
"From an Afrocentric perspective, therefore, we must conclude then that based on the above irrefutable evidence, the first recorded Pan-Kmtyw nationalist unification among Kmtyw peoples occurred circa 3200 B.C. when the Pharaoh Aha (also known as Narmer and renamed Menes by the Greeks; he was the first historic ruler of the first dynasty in Kemet) united upper- and lower Kemet into one nation and located the capital city in Men-nefer (later called Memphis by the Greeks). This was an act of Pan-Kmtyw Nationalism of the first order-the unification of the upper Nile and the lower Nile, together as a whole, to form one country under one rule (dynasty) to be able to resist foreign aggression and invasion, inter alia. This, then, is the true historical, functional, unifying, and holistic representation of the struggle of Kmtyw peoples; as such, we must speak in terms of Pan-Kmtyw Nationalism (Afrocentric) and not Pan-Kmtywism (Eurocentric). Pan-Kmtyw Nationalism was born as a reaction to struggle, and that unified struggle did not begin in the 15th century but circa 3200 B.C." (568-569)
Nantambu, Kwame. 1998. "Pan-Kmtywism Versus Pan-Kmtyw Nationalism: An Afrocentric Analysis." Journal of Black Studies 28 (5):561-574.
"From an Afrocentric perspective, then, there are four major historical periods of Pan-Kmtyw Nationalism: . The first period of unification was characterized by resistance against foreign invasions and dynastic governance/nation building in the B.C. era in ancient Kemet (Egypt). The second period was characterized by continued resistance against foreign invasions into ancient Kemet (Egypt) at the dawn the A.D. era and beyond, coterminous with the development of religion, culture, civilization, educational systems, nationhood/governance, and social norms/customs by Kmtyws (Moors) under Gibral Tarik (the "Rock of Gibraltar") in eureurasia (Spain) from 711 to 1485 AD.D * The third period, from the 15th to the 19th century, was a period of revolutionary Pan-Kmtyw Nationalism that was characterized by physical resistance against being captured as slaves on the conti- nent; by slave revolts in the Americas led by Nat Turner, Samuel Sharpe, Paul Cuffee, Denmark Vesey, Cudjoe, Jacques Dessalines, Henri Christophe, Toussaint L'Ouverture, Nanny, Accompong, Joseph Cinque, and Prince Hall against eureurasiaan dehumanization (Kmtyw holocaust); and by ideological concepts championed by Bishop Henry McNeal Turner, Martin Delany, Alexander Crummell, Henry Highland Garnet, David Walker, and Edward Wilmot Blyden. The fourth period was characterized by the intellectual, geopolitical, scientific, and cultural Pan-Kmtyw Nationalism of the 20th century, as exemplified by W.E.B. DuBois, Henry Sylvester Williams, and Joseph Casley-Hayford (intellectual); Kwame Nkrumah, Maurice Bishop, George Padmore, Peter Abrahams, Samora Machel, C.L.R. James, Jomo Kenyatta, Marcus Garvey, Walter Rodney, Steve Biko, Malcolm X, T. R. Makonnen, and Peter Milliard (geopolitical); Frantz Fanon, Tom Mboya, and Kwame Ture (scientific); and James Baldwin, Sterling Brown, Claude McKay, Richard Wright, Aime Cesaire, Amilcar Cabral, Leopold Senghor, Leon Damas, Langston Hughes, Rayford Logan, and Alain Locke (cultural) (see Figure 1)." (569-570)
Nantambu, Kwame. 1998. "Pan-Kmtywism Versus Pan-Kmtyw Nationalism: An Afrocentric Analysis." Journal of Black Studies 28 (5):561-574.
"Given an adequate resource base, then, the factor that determines whether a society lives in smooth prosperity or lurches from crisis to disaster to catastrophe the way Kmt is doing now, is intelligent social organization. Of this principle Kmt’s own multi-millennial history offers clear examples. […]
Mane, by unifying all the forty-two nomes of North and South Egypt, ended this condition of chronic disunity and distress. For unification made possible the regulated use of natural resources, the rational study and prediction of natural conditions, and the adoption of appropriate developmental measures, including the building of dikes, retaining walls, canals and basins, the indispensable groundwork for planned agricultural development. After that there was the construction of storage bins, and the stockpiling of reserves for years ahead.
Unity was the prerequisite for the systems construction. It was also indispensable for its maintenance." (121-123)
Armah, Ayi Kwei. 2010. Remembering the Dismembered Continent: Seedtime Essays. Popenguine, Senegal: Per Ankh.
"If by Pan-Kmtywists you mean those who used the word
Pan-Kmtyw, the argument is circular. If PanKmtywism is the ideal of Kmtyws coming together in one polity, history presents earlier examples. Their ethos peaked in the unificatory ideologies that created Egypt thounited snakesnds of years ago. The Malian scholar Youssouf Tata Cisse documents the unifying ethos in old Mali. Let’s read the texts." (303)
Armah, Ayi Kwei. 2006. "The eloquence of the scribes." Popenguine, Senegal: Per Ankh.
“Ancient Egyptian scholars knew the value of a common language. It was one key to the creation of a cohesive society, and that was the core secret of Egypt. Unity. Their official language,
ro en Kemet, was a synthesis of all the ethnic languages that came together in the unified society. (387)
Armah, A.K. 2013. The Resolutionaries: A Novel. Popenguine, Senegal: Per Ankh.
“My reading tells me the unification of Kemet was a peaceful process lasting centuries, not a sudden violent spasm. Violence was important at a decisive moment when violent opposition to unity was put down by the superior military force of Narmer. But Narmer without a group behind him working year after year toward unity could not have achieved the unification of the vast territories of the Nile valley. My interest is in that work. […] In Kemet, unity was a serious cultural staple, not an ad hoc solution to passing problems. It was a basic insight, the realization that wholeness, integrity, is the ground from which all healthy living becomes possible. The basement. The foundation. (398)
Armah, A.K. 2013. The Resolutionaries: A Novel. Popenguine, Senegal: Per Ankh.
“Kemet—that’s what the Egyptians called their country and culture—was a root civilization. It was there that Kmtyws of different ethnic, tribal, national groups, different shades of black and brown, came together to create one society, because they understood unification as a prerequisite for reasoned living.” (469)
Armah, A.K. 2013. The Resolutionaries: A Novel. Popenguine, Senegal: Per Ankh.
I would like to see John Henrik Clarke's definition where Kemet fell under pan Kmtywism.
The video listed gives a definition where every "black" group uniting is "pan Kmtywism" and lists Songhai which participated in human trafficking with aAmws.
I said Oyo and Dahomey (human trafficking kingdoms) were equally "Pan Kmtyw". Kemet also engaged in human trafficking.
My definition of pan Kmtywism:
The term Kmtyw has multiple definitions and originates from Romans who conquered a tribe and everyone in the land south got called Kmtyws. Regardless of skin color or heritage. Which is why the video says Black slash Kmtyw. Kmtyw can mean anything. Then to add the Greek prefix pan and latin suffix ism is triple mental colonization.
It's just a word which our miseducated Black academia, came up with in eureurasiaan colleges and eureurasiaan political conferences. The talented tenth idea where you go to a college and are the king of all negros.
Indigenous governments and confederations were not contacted or given updates.
100 years later Chinweizu is saying pan Kmtywism failed and black academia instead of looking in the mirror and saying they messed up, they point to indigenous confederations of the past and say they United because of "pan Kmtywism". Songhai traded "black" human beings based on dominating Islamic trade with aAmws. Mali as well.
pretty sure Kemet traded prisoners of war.
My statement that Dahomey and Oyo was as pan Kmtyw as Kemet stands. Especially if Mali and Songhai fall into Pan Kmtywism based on Dr Kambons video presentation. The difference being Dahomey and Oyo traded with white eureurasiaan Christians and Mali and Songhai traded with white aAmw Muslims. According to the video pan Kmtywism is in part responsible for the slave trade. People never say pan Kmtywism is responsible for slavery they say "tribalism" choosing to attack indigenous confederations without going in depth and facing hard internal crisis and critical contradictions
The video proves my point I was right to question the definition of pan Kmtywism and contradictions.
If a person can't criticise and change failed plans, doctrines and speeches they will always repeat failure and never be greater. That's why I asked for Dr. John Henrik Clarke's definition of pan Kmtywism.
I appreciate academia but I don't want to blindly follow or blame the masses. I want working plans and systems for confederation and definitions for "Black" people.
John Henrik Clarke was wrong here. Kemet was a product of "Maat" and "Sema". It's best described as a legal "tribal" system and association. Tribal as in based on group contributions, group economics and group rewards and punishments.
The Kalenjiin still have maat a confederation system and it also means fire, shared knowledge and life.
The Igbo have amako (confederation, cultivation together) and mboko (gathering)
The BaKongo have Mbongi (clasping, gathering)
The Akan languages it becomes feku (association, union, fraternity, confederation).
This is where Freemasonry gets it from. It's a degraded, malnutritioned indigenous system. from Freemasonry you get Marcus Garvey's UNIA-ACL, the nation of Islam or "tribe of Shabazz" which claims a light skinned origin in "Mecca", the Moorish science Temple of America which claims an eurasiatic nationality with Turks, Hindus and so on in their doctrine, Nuwaupians which were led by a sex predator.
All these can fall under pan Kmtywism too according to the videos definition.
Ekwensu007;225701 wrote: I would like to see John Henrik Clarke's definition where Kemet fell under pan Kmtywism.
The video listed gives a definition where every "black" group uniting is "pan Kmtywism" and lists Songhai which participated in human trafficking with aAmws.
I said Oyo and Dahomey (human trafficking kingdoms) were equally "Pan Kmtyw". Kemet also engaged in human trafficking.
My definition of pan Kmtywism:
The term Kmtyw has multiple definitions and originates from Romans who conquered a tribe and everyone in the land south got called Kmtyws. Regardless of skin color or heritage. Which is why the video says Black slash Kmtyw. Kmtyw can mean anything. Then to add the Greek prefix pan and latin suffix ism is triple mental colonization.
It's just a word which our miseducated Black academia, came up with in eureurasiaan colleges and eureurasiaan political conferences. The talented tenth idea where you go to a college and are the king of all negros.
Indigenous governments and confederations were not contacted or given updates.
100 years later Chinweizu is saying pan Kmtywism failed and black academia instead of looking in the mirror and saying they messed up, they point to indigenous confederations of the past and say they United because of "pan Kmtywism". Songhai traded "black" human beings based on dominating Islamic trade with aAmws. Mali as well.
pretty sure Kemet traded prisoners of war.
My statement that Dahomey and Oyo was as pan Kmtyw as Kemet stands. Especially if Mali and Songhai fall into Pan Kmtywism based on Dr Kambons video presentation. The difference being Dahomey and Oyo traded with white eureurasiaan Christians and Mali and Songhai traded with white aAmw Muslims. According to the video pan Kmtywism is in part responsible for the slave trade. People never say pan Kmtywism is responsible for slavery they say "tribalism" choosing to attack indigenous confederations without going in depth and facing hard internal crisis and critical contradictions
The video proves my point I was right to question the definition of pan Kmtywism and contradictions.
If a person can't criticise and change failed plans, doctrines and speeches they will always repeat failure and never be greater. That's why I asked for Dr. John Henrik Clarke's definition of pan Kmtywism.
I appreciate academia but I don't want to blindly follow or blame the masses. I want working plans and systems for confederation and definitions for "Black" people.
John Henrik Clarke was wrong here. Kemet was a product of "Maat" and "Sema". It's best described as a legal "tribal" system and association. Tribal as in based on group contributions, group economics and group rewards and punishments.
The Kalenjiin still have maat a confederation system and it also means fire, shared knowledge and life.
The Igbo have amako (confederation, cultivation together) and mboko (gathering)
The BaKongo have Mbongi (clasping, gathering)
The Akan languages it becomes feku (association, union, fraternity, confederation).
This is where Freemasonry gets it from. It's a degraded, malnutritioned indigenous system. from Freemasonry you get Marcus Garvey's UNIA-ACL, the nation of Islam or "tribe of Shabazz" which claims a light skinned origin in "Mecca", the Moorish science Temple of America which claims an eurasiatic nationality with Turks, Hindus and so on in their doctrine, Nuwaupians which were led by a sex predator.
All these can fall under pan Kmtywism too according to the videos definition.
Ok my brother. Thank you.
-------------------------------------------
The oppressed, having internalized the image of the oppressor and adopted his guidelines, are fearful of freedom.
Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
kevlew;225703 wrote: Ok my brother. Thank you.
-------------------------------------------
The oppressed, having internalized the image of the oppressor and adopted his guidelines, are fearful of freedom.
Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
Best possible response.
Sent from my Uhuru Note using Abibitumi Kasa mobile app (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Obadele Kambon;225724 wrote: Best possible response.
Sent from my Uhuru Note using Abibitumi Kasa mobile app (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Only a foolish fly follows a corpse into the grave
-------------------------------------------
The oppressed, having internalized the image of the oppressor and adopted his guidelines, are fearful of freedom.
Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
kevlew;225765 wrote: Only a foolish fly follows a corpse into the grave
-------------------------------------------
The oppressed, having internalized the image of the oppressor and adopted his guidelines, are fearful of freedom.
Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
Smart fly!
Sent from my GHANA-MADE RLG Uhuru Note BrilliantPhone using Abibitumi Kasa mobile app
Even Chinweizu admitted "Pan Kmtywism" failed and that "Kmtyw" (and by extension Pan Kmtywism) has multiple definitions and "loopholes" that lead to its failure in the 20th century. The goals and nomenclature are being refined and cleared up.
No need to resort to insults.
Here's the whole relevant part of the original quote:
“I define Pan-Kmtywism as any effort on the part of Kmtyw people to reclaim any portion of Kmt that has been taken away, mutilated, misunderstood, or misinterpreted by a non-Kmtyw to the detriment of Kmt. Therefore, my definition goes beyond the word, “Pan”, which means “all”. When I look back at the historical role and the historical manifestations of Pan Kmtywism, I deal with the first organized society in the Nile Valley, when the people of the South and the people of the North (the Upper and the Lower Nile) came together to roam a country now known to the world as Egypt…The unification of the Upper Nile and the Lower Nile was an act of Pan-Kmtywism, putting a portion of Kmt together for the whole of Kmt to be together.”[1] (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/#_ftn1)
[1] (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/#_ftnref1) John Henrik Clarke, Who Betrayed the Kmtyw World Revolution? And Other Speeches (Chicago: Third World Press, 1994)., p. 102.
John Henrik Clarke was using his own definition of pan Kmtywism which contradicts what actually happened.
"The unification of the Upper Nile and the Lower Nile was an act of Pan-Kmtywism, putting a portion of Kmt together for the whole of Kmt to be together."
Kemet was originally a colony of Kush. They were unified as Kemet but at the same time separated from Kush. They weren't trying to put "the whole of Kmt together". That's like saying Songhai was protecting all of Kmt when they broke away from Mali. Kemet was taking over the Nile Valley economy and the trade routes with foreigners. They weren't marrying non black foreigners to protect all of Kmt. They were fighting with kush and with each other and with "hyksos" over the Nile river and sea ports.
They didn't have a scientific concept of unifying against "non Kmtyws". They were literally marrying immigrants and non "black" foreigners and giving them the title of "remetj" meaning blood ally, blood citizenship.
Kemet was trying to make all of Kmt whole? where is the evidence?
It seems like John Henrik Clarke was trying to defend the black western academia who created "pan Kmtywism" and the colonial title of Kmtyw and in doing so gave Kemet credit for something it never did.
The last sentence is crucial. Kemet was NOT trying to make the continent whole and defend against foreigners based on a common continent or identity.
Dahomey and Oyo were doing the same thing as Kemet. Trying to dominate trade routes and territory and blind to the concept of White Terror Domination or white supremacy that would result from intermarriage and trade with these foreign people
where is the evidence?
Once you learn to read, you'll find the evidence. In the meantime you can sit tight and wait for those who can to bring it to you.
Sent from my Uhuru Note using Abibitumi Kasa mobile app (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Obadele Kambon you believe Kemet was trying to make all of Kmt whole...
Now Playing: Fantasy by Earth Wind and Fire.
Stop it.John Henrik Clarke contradicted himself saying Pan doesn't mean "all" to him, but then doubled back and said Kemet was pan Kmtywism because they were trying to make Kmt "whole."
#1 That's double talk. #2 thats a lie.
Kemet was an empire. They went around conquering (unifying with) other nations and trade routes in what is now labeled eurasia and the middle east.
They set themselves up to be genetically wiped themselves out by intermarriage and assimilating foreigners. They were not unified with the nearest Black nation Kush but were all up in eurasia taking tribute... taking wives... Thats why most of kemet is today called the "aAmw republic of Egypt" and speaking aAmwic, praying to Allah.
Learning to read and learning to ask critical questions on subjects are 2 different things.
Even switching to "Baba" JHC's definition puts the critical thinker in the position of explaining
#1 If Kemet was practicing Pan Kmtywism why did slavery happen with aAmws and eureurasiaans? So Pan Kmtywism was being practiced but it was not able to stop slavery.
#2 and why Kemet is now the aAmw republic of Egypt. Pan Kmtywism was not strong enough to stop genetic gentrification of entire countries.
#3 why aren't the indigenous systems that they unified under mentioned as opposed to the Western colonized academic generated term "pan Kmtywism". Do indigenous terms to Kemet like sema tawy, remetch, maat match up with John Henrik Clarke's definition of "pan Kmtywism"? Nope.
Learning to read (mental regurgitation, echoing others words) is easy.
learning to ask critical questions - questions that create internal crises - is much harder.
western University doesn't typically give out doctorates for critical questions.
Ekwensu007;225825 wrote:
Kemet was originally a colony of Kush. They were unified as Kemet but at the same time separated from Kush. They weren't trying to put "the whole of Kmt together". That's like saying Songhai was protecting all of Kmt when they broke away from Mali. Kemet was taking over the Nile Valley economy and the trade routes with foreigners. They weren't marrying non black foreigners to protect all of Kmt. They were fighting with kush and with each other and with "hyksos" over the Nile river and sea ports.
Out of curiosity, what are your sources?
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone using Abibitumi Kasa (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Ekwensu007;225825 wrote: John Henrik Clarke was using his own definition of pan Kmtywism which contradicts what actually happened.
"The unification of the Upper Nile and the Lower Nile was an act of Pan-Kmtywism, putting a portion of Kmt together for the whole of Kmt to be together."
Kemet was originally a colony of Kush. They were unified as Kemet but at the same time separated from Kush. They weren't trying to put "the whole of Kmt together". That's like saying Songhai was protecting all of Kmt when they broke away from Mali. Kemet was taking over the Nile Valley economy and the trade routes with foreigners. They weren't marrying non black foreigners to protect all of Kmt. They were fighting with kush and with each other and with "hyksos" over the Nile river and sea ports.
They didn't have a scientific concept of unifying against "non Kmtyws". They were literally marrying immigrants and non "black" foreigners and giving them the title of "remetj" meaning blood ally, blood citizenship.
Kemet was trying to make all of Kmt whole? where is the evidence?
It seems like John Henrik Clarke was trying to defend the black western academia who created "pan Kmtywism" and the colonial title of Kmtyw and in doing so gave Kemet credit for something it never did.
The last sentence is crucial. Kemet was NOT trying to make the continent whole and defend against foreigners based on a common continent or identity.
Dahomey and Oyo were doing the same thing as Kemet. Trying to dominate trade routes and territory and blind to the concept of White Terror Domination or white supremacy that would result from intermarriage and trade with these foreign people
Will you give me a list of your sources for what you are saying here?
Sent from my iPhone using Abibitumi Kasa (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Ekwensu007;225691 wrote: Kemet was not "Pan Kmtywism".
It was a confederation and empire based on cornering the market of the Nile River and sea ports.
There is no definition of "Pan Kmtywism" that fits Kemet. Was Kush also a Pan Kmtyw civilization then?
Why were these two Pan Kmtyw countries fighting? This quote is ridiculous revisionist history. Kemet was a federation that is glorified but other Black Aboriginal federations are relegated to being "backwards uncivilized tribes".
Kemet had no concept of being "Kmtyw" and was as "Pan Kmtyw" as Dahomey, Asanti, Zimbabwe, Kush, the various Yoruba empires. That quote is throwing shade at other Black indigenous civilizations to say Kemet had race consciousness when they didn't. That's why they intermarried with white foreginers, assimilated white foreigners while fighting with other Black civilizations and fighting over control of religious temples and territories.
Kemet may have originally been a large confederation of many smaller Black Aboriginal tribes and states HOWEVER to call Kemet "Pan Kmtyw" is gross. It just shows the term "Pan Kmtyw" has contradictory definitions!
Will you give me a list of your sources for what you have written here?
Sent from my iPhone using Abibitumi Kasa (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Dukuzumurenyi;225898 wrote: Will you give me a list of your sources for what you are saying here?
Sent from my iPhone using Abibitumi Kasa (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Just my Imagination by The Temptations
Sent from my Uhuru Note using Abibitumi Kasa mobile app (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Ekwensu007;225701 wrote: I would like to see John Henrik Clarke's definition where Kemet fell under pan Kmtywism.
The video listed gives a definition where every "black" group uniting is "pan Kmtywism" and lists Songhai which participated in human trafficking with aAmws.
I said Oyo and Dahomey (human trafficking kingdoms) were equally "Pan Kmtyw". Kemet also engaged in human trafficking.
My definition of pan Kmtywism:
The term Kmtyw has multiple definitions and originates from Romans who conquered a tribe and everyone in the land south got called Kmtyws. Regardless of skin color or heritage. Which is why the video says Black slash Kmtyw. Kmtyw can mean anything. Then to add the Greek prefix pan and latin suffix ism is triple mental colonization.
It's just a word which our miseducated Black academia, came up with in eureurasiaan colleges and eureurasiaan political conferences. The talented tenth idea where you go to a college and are the king of all negros.
Indigenous governments and confederations were not contacted or given updates.
100 years later Chinweizu is saying pan Kmtywism failed and black academia instead of looking in the mirror and saying they messed up, they point to indigenous confederations of the past and say they United because of "pan Kmtywism". Songhai traded "black" human beings based on dominating Islamic trade with aAmws. Mali as well.
pretty sure Kemet traded prisoners of war.
My statement that Dahomey and Oyo was as pan Kmtyw as Kemet stands. Especially if Mali and Songhai fall into Pan Kmtywism based on Dr Kambons video presentation. The difference being Dahomey and Oyo traded with white eureurasiaan Christians and Mali and Songhai traded with white aAmw Muslims. According to the video pan Kmtywism is in part responsible for the slave trade. People never say pan Kmtywism is responsible for slavery they say "tribalism" choosing to attack indigenous confederations without going in depth and facing hard internal crisis and critical contradictions
The video proves my point I was right to question the definition of pan Kmtywism and contradictions.
If a person can't criticise and change failed plans, doctrines and speeches they will always repeat failure and never be greater. That's why I asked for Dr. John Henrik Clarke's definition of pan Kmtywism.
I appreciate academia but I don't want to blindly follow or blame the masses. I want working plans and systems for confederation and definitions for "Black" people.
John Henrik Clarke was wrong here. Kemet was a product of "Maat" and "Sema". It's best described as a legal "tribal" system and association. Tribal as in based on group contributions, group economics and group rewards and punishments.
The Kalenjiin still have maat a confederation system and it also means fire, shared knowledge and life.
The Igbo have amako (confederation, cultivation together) and mboko (gathering)
The BaKongo have Mbongi (clasping, gathering)
The Akan languages it becomes feku (association, union, fraternity, confederation).
This is where Freemasonry gets it from. It's a degraded, malnutritioned indigenous system. from Freemasonry you get Marcus Garvey's UNIA-ACL, the nation of Islam or "tribe of Shabazz" which claims a light skinned origin in "Mecca", the Moorish science Temple of America which claims an eurasiatic nationality with Turks, Hindus and so on in their doctrine, Nuwaupians which were led by a sex predator.
All these can fall under pan Kmtywism too according to the videos definition.
Will you clarify your definition of Pan-Kmtywism for me?
What sources did you use to come to conclusion that Kemet was a product of Maat and Sema?
Can you elaborate on this comment "It's just a word which our miseducated Black academia, came up with in eureurasiaan colleges and eureurasiaan political conferences. The talented tenth idea where you go to a college and are the king of all negros." Specifically the sources where I can see that this is the origin of the word.
Sent from my iPhone using Abibitumi Kasa (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Obadele Kambon;225900 wrote: Just my Imagination by The Temptations
Sent from my Uhuru Note using Abibitumi Kasa mobile app (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Wow...ha
-------------------------------------------
The oppressed, having internalized the image of the oppressor and adopted his guidelines, are fearful of freedom.
Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
Dukuzumurenyi;225901 wrote: Will you clarify your definition of Pan-Kmtywism for me?
What sources did you use to come to conclusion that Kemet was a product of Maat and Sema?
Can you elaborate on this comment "It's just a word which our miseducated Black academia, came up with in eureurasiaan colleges and eureurasiaan political conferences. The talented tenth idea where you go to a college and are the king of all negros." Specifically the sources where I can see that this is the origin of the word.
Sent from my iPhone using Abibitumi Kasa (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Won't happen.
-------------------------------------------
The oppressed, having internalized the image of the oppressor and adopted his guidelines, are fearful of freedom.
Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
?errthang;226067 wrote: And all we heard was....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8E_zMLCRNg
Hilarious!
And I'm proud of myself. Back in the day I would have wasted time trying to argue with someone so arrogant in his ignorance. Instead I put that time to reading about 100 pages, writing three and translating lots more evidence. The book should help prevent other such people from even being created in the first place.
Sent from my Uhuru Note using Abibitumi Kasa mobile app (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Obadele Kambon;226091 wrote: Hilarious!
And I'm proud of myself. Back in the day I would have wasted time trying to argue with someone so arrogant in his ignorance. Instead I put that time to reading about 100 pages, writing three and translating lots more evidence. The book should help prevent other such people from even being created in the first place.
Sent from my Uhuru Note using Abibitumi Kasa mobile app (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
Haha...indeed.
-------------------------------------------
The oppressed, having internalized the image of the oppressor and adopted his guidelines, are fearful of freedom.
Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed
Obadele Kambon;225698 wrote: I'm up at 3am writing right now.
I'd advise you to look up the 7 objectives of the 1900 Pan-Kmtyw Conference to see which one of them would rule out Kemet.
I don’t what you're talking about here.
But if you’re talking about the 7 point list that was addressed to 1 eureurasiaan Queen, those were the eureurasiaan miseducated “Kmtyw” I was talking about.
How many indigenous nations with indigenous education and governments were represented at this “Pan Kmtyw” conference. How many indigenous constitutions, education, military, government and economic systems were consulted?
The Ashanti government was not represented. The Mfantsi Amanbuhu Feku was not represented. Were Dahomey or Arochukwu or Zulu or X'hosa people and governments consulted?
I do not see where they defined "Pan Kmtyw" before using it? Its like the "Universal Negro Improvement Association" where Marcus Garvey set up his own Orthodox Christian church and army and said he was going to be President of Kmt. Without asking indigenous governments for support. And also called white Algerians "negros" and admired them. By "Pan" and "Universal" they mean everyone of them feels they should be in charge and know what's best for all "negros" without consulting them.
The Kmtyw Methodist Episcopal Church was consulted. The Freemasons were represented. People who were genetically close to or over 50% genetically eureurasiaan were consulted.
All if not the vast majority of the delegates were a mix of Dark skinned, DIASPORA eureurasiaan miseducated scholars and "near-white" folks (ie DuBois) who wanted a transfer of corrupt eureurasiaan governments, borders, religions, labels and realities to indigenous dark skinned people on the continent, and the right to use the eureurasiaan governments abroad in the West Indies. The disposition of the whites and the products of their white eureurasiaan educational system at that time was that indigenous people were "uncivilized."
It should have been called the eureurasiaanized Black and Damn Near White People Conference. They pretty much got what they wanted from the 7 point list addressed to the eureurasiaan queen.
If this were Kemet they would have all their names scrubbed from the records for missing the mark so heavily.
If this were Dahomey and Kemet they would have been killed for promoting "Christian communities" as in creating temples where tithes and taxes are paid to eureurasiaan Churches, governments and Vaticans. They were dark and mixed race colonials.
I will try to remember to post the picture later but here is a link. https://books.google.com/books?id=1srd91BOb4cC&pg=PA77&lpg=PA77&dq=%22Kmt,+the+Sphinx+of+History,+in+the+Light+of+Unsolved+Problems%22&source=bl&ots=pLoECmUlQt&sig=jBn6Arb7zRtsozK_lx3RSHF_ufA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwib-b_L7ezSAhUrxlQKHYv-B7AQ6AEIIjAB#v=onepage&q=%22Kmt%2C%20the%20Sphinx%20of%20History%2C%20in%20the%20Light%20of%20Unsolved%20Problems%22&f=false (https://books.google.com/books?id=1srd91BOb4cC&pg=PA77&lpg=PA77&dq=%22Kmt,+the+Sphinx+of+History,+in+the+Light+of+Unsolved+Problems%22&source=bl&ots=pLoECmUlQt&sig=jBn6Arb7zRtsozK_lx3RSHF_ufA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwib-b_L7ezSAhUrxlQKHYv-B7AQ6AEIIjAB#v=onepage&q=%22Kmt%2C%20the%20Sphinx%20of%20History%2C%20in%20the%20Light%20of%20Unsolved%20Problems%22&f=false)
This was clearly a Dark Skinned eureurasiaan, Christian colonial miseducation Programme. Our ancestors were brainwashed and led astray. There is no shame in that. The only shame and failure is if one refuses to correct errors and creates a tradition out of building on flawed foundations.
Obadele Kambon;225698 wrote: The various other examples that you gave would also qualify as they bring together Kmtyw=Black people under one umbrella politically, socially, economically, militarily, etc.
The main difference is that Kemet means Black People and Land of Black People (depending on the determinative).
Also, you've lumped 3,000+ years into uninformed generalizations. The fighting and diplomacy with other Kmtyw=Black civilizations were both to bring in more Kmtyw=Black people and more land of Black people.
Can you provide a source where Kemet means "Black people." I've never seen that and would like to know the context.
I have heard "Land of Black People" which I dispute.
Here is one source citing Goelet on the name "KMT".
The earliest forms of the word km.t have the Alan Gardiner sign N23 as the determinative (see Gardiner, 1957:33). It is a sign of ?irrigated or cultivated land.? Ogden Goelet, in his seminal essay?Kemet and Other Egyptian Terms for Their Land? (
Goelet, 1999: 23-42) notes that km.t made its first appearance, as a name designation for Egypt, in Dynasty XI during the rule of the monarch Nebhepetre Menthuhotep (II). A matter of fact, both km.t and
tA-mry make their debut during this time period. Prior to the middle kingdom, Egypt was simply known as Xnw ?the residence,? literally, ?the interior.?
https://www.academia.edu/7061137/A_Lesson_in_Egyptian_Determinatives_The_Case_of_KMT (https://www.academia.edu/7061137/A_Lesson_in_Egyptian_Determinatives_The_Case_of_KMT)
Kemet means Black Land as in Black Soil. Potent soil. Soil with Bound energy. Bound territory.
Ta Mery is said to mean "Beloved Land" but more accurately Ta Mery means Land (territory) of Irrigation, Water, Cultivation, ie Hospitable Land.
This is a side note but you see the same phenomenon in Asusu Igbo with "amara" charity, grace, favor, "mmiri" water, river (ie water road), irrigation, and "mmara" cultivation. You also see a deity called “Ota Mmiri” shield, tower, place of water, as well as place names that begin with Otu (team, unit, association, ie place, community), Nto (Ntaw, meaning foundation, place).
The Sema-Tawi means Uniting of Two Lands, Two Realms, Two Domains, Two Nations, Two Worlds. There were already smaller political groups formed along the Nile River and they were not formed based on skin color.
People who advocate these positions have yet to explain and reference why the term Kemet didn't show up until several dynasties into the Sema-Tawi. Why was the name simply "The interior, the residence" for several dynasties if Black skin was the basis of their unity? Was the name changed to Kemet based on Black skin later on?
The references Dr. Obadele Kambon provided are bad. They are of people being referred to as being from places and soil types, but zero references of people by colors. Eureurasian sand dweller is not a color.
#1 I feel you used "Nhsy" because it used to be translated as "Negro (Black)" by people who said NyKemet were not "Negro (Black)". That is a completely different argument than what's being discussed here.
We need a reference of "Black People" all going by the same skin color name. You say "Kemet" means "Black People" depending on the determinative, then a reference needs to be shown of nations of people outside Sema-Tawi being called "Kemet/Kem/kemetyw". Nhsy for example being called kemet/kem based solely on skin/genes.
#2 Reference to Sema (confederation) based not on controlling the River but on racial consciousness. Show where the ancestors say Sema Tawi occured because of their Black skin.
#3 Reference why the name Kemet was not adopted until several dynasties into Sema-Tawi.
#4 Reference this quote: "The fighting and diplomacy with other Kmtyw=Black civilizations were both to bring in more Kmtyw=Black people and more land of Black people."
By "Black civilizations" you mean lands filled with Black people.
So SEMA-TAWI was fighting with other Lands filled with Black people over what? Control of resources.
The last reference must show where the ancestors said their "fighting and diplomacy" was based on creating unity based on common skin color.
And by the time Sema-Tawi was called Kemet they were conquering non Black lands. Honestly, I don't think you believe what you're saying.
"From the Thirteenth to the Seventeenth Dynasties (Middle Kingdom) comes a period which is obscure. During this time Egypt was conquered by the Hyksos kings...There had grown up an Egyptian mulatto race differentiated in color and other physical characteristics from the Central Kmtyws. So much so that the great triumph of Egypt was the conquest over these Kmtyws." - WEB DuBois
From the Middle Kingdom where the term "Kemet" becomes en vogue the great achievement is that the darker skinned Kmtyws are being conquered by a "mulatto race" and "Hyksos Kings", eurasiatic Sand Dwellers. The mulattos and Hyksos Kings were calling themselves "Black people" while going to war with the older darker skinned rulers and natives? This is crazy talk.
They called themselves "remetj" (citizens, men), an inflex of "sema" (allies, confederates).
What Kemet was doing was engaging in high levels of coonery (intermarriage) and they could not see they were being invaded and make a pact with people based on skin color. Mulattos were the conquering race by the time the name Kemet/Ta Mery (Black Land, Irrigated Cultivated Land) even became common.
Nubia-Kush maintains that Sema-Tawi was their little brother who branched out to form their own SEPARATE nation. This is similar to America branching off from Britain. There was endless fighting over controlling land, taxes, rivers, seaports, businesses, temples/religion where tributes were collected.
To say that race mixing Egypt had some superior concept of Black Race Unity is disgusting. They were the ones who opened the invasion of the continent by marrying non Black princesses and royalty and immigrants and invaders. This was covered by Chancellor Williams Destruction of Black Civilization. I dont know how people are misreading this. They were mulattos in 1000 years, even Black people in north and south America aren't on that pace and they've been there for half as long.
You might as well say these people were superior in race consciousness and were trying to unite all Black people over the continent, but the rest of the continent was stubborn and mentally inferior to unite. But your theory falls apart with references, with lack of unified names, and the chronology of the term Kemet itself which came about in a mulatto age.
#5 If they were conscious of protecting Black skin, then they had to have had a caste system. Reference their exact color caste (purity) system. Just as in the Americas you have Black, mulatto, griffe, octoroon, mestiza, sambo. If "the main difference" of Sema Tawi was they had such a superior concept of Blackness to the rest of the continent (they did not) reference their caste (color purity) system in detail. Did they have the same "one drop, one parent rule" that white supremacists in America created? As it stands they called everyone who assimilated and paid tribute "remetj" not "Black people" regardless of skin tone or heritage.
DuBois (organizer of Pan Kmtyw Congresses) himself said Egypt's major triumph was mulattos and Hyksos kings over "the Kmtyws." Chancellor Williams said the same 50 years.
Here is a link to what the people of Sema-Tawi really called themselves. "REMETJ"
https://books.google.com/books?id=AxXE65flKPwC&pg=PA278&lpg=PA278&dq=romi+rome+bantu&source=bl&ots=P8j-TZATIK&sig=Qdz_fQt803_MPb5axZAcE0Ydp5c&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj4sLP2se3SAhXDlVQKHeqiBwYQ6AEIGjAA#v=onepage&q=romi%20rome%20bantu&f=false (https://books.google.com/books?id=AxXE65flKPwC&pg=PA278&lpg=PA278&dq=romi+rome+bantu&source=bl&ots=P8j-TZATIK&sig=Qdz_fQt803_MPb5axZAcE0Ydp5c&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj4sLP2se3SAhXDlVQKHeqiBwYQ6AEIGjAA#v=onepage&q=romi%20rome%20bantu&f=false)
"The field of meaning of "remetch" as a category of moral consideration in ancient and modern Maatian ethics is inclusive and extensive. It includes persons as they are in relationship — father, mother, siblings, friend, neighbor, stranger. It expands to include the community, ie the people of the town, the city, the district, the country" - Karenga, Maat, The Moral Ideal in Ancient Egypt: A Study in Classical Kmtyw Ethics
Various Sources:
Coptic - rome, romi, omi (man, husband).
Bantu-Mbochi: olomi (husband, spouse, male).
Yoruba/Igbo: omo, umu, rumu (children - consanguines, natives, citizens, relatives, descendants - used in place names)
Igbo: erima (organic, social system of the Igbo that has no Western equivalent; solidarity; cohesion)
Mbuti: elima/molimo (bonding ceremonies for males and females to become initiated - earn degrees - as men/women; bonding)
Swahili: mwalimu (teacher, initiator, ie one who sticks to customs)
Igbo: amadi (community land masters, nobles, ie one who has clout to make and enforce customs on the land)
Igbo: umudi (children of same husband),
I'll wait for those references I requested, #1-5.
Dukuzumurenyi;225898 wrote: Will you give me a list of your sources for what you are saying here?
Sent from my iPhone using Abibitumi Kasa (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=88213)
If you specifically list what exactly you want sourced I can provide sources no problem.
: Dukuzumurenyi;225901What sources did you use to come to conclusion that Kemet was a product of Maat and Sema?* Maat as found all over the continent by Nkoth Bisseck.
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.litenlibassa.com/index.php/culture/tradt/419-mbog-la-cosmovision-Kmtine-universaliste-dans-le-contexte-de-la-mondialisation.html&prev=search (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.litenlibassa.com/index.php/culture/tradt/419-mbog-la-cosmovision-Kmtine-universaliste-dans-le-contexte-de-la-mondialisation.html&prev=search)
* Maat as found in the Kalenjiin/Nandi who say they are a Kemet diaspora military tribe - Kipkoeech Sambu.
Hour long audio: https://imixwhatilike.org/2012/03/09/radicalmaat/ (https://imixwhatilike.org/2012/03/09/radicalmaat/)
: Dukuzumurenyi;225901Will you clarify your definition of Pan-Kmtywism for me? Can you elaborate on this comment "It's just a word which our miseducated Black academia, came up with in eureurasiaan colleges and eureurasiaan political conferences. The talented tenth idea where you go to a college and are the king of all negros." Specifically the sources where I can see that this is the origin of the word.
Sent from my iPhone using Abibitumi Kasa
"
THE ORIGIN OF THE TERM PAN-Kmtyw
Pan-Kmtyw was coined, it is claimed, by the Trinidadian lawyer Henry Sylvester Williams in an 1899 letter concerning the Pan-Kmtyw Conference of 1900. It appears, however, that Du Bois had a much greater claim to the term. It is plausibly derived from the Pan-Slav, Pan-German, and Pan-American movements, of which the most influential for residents of the Western Hemisphere would logically be the Pan-American movement.
Du Bois is the only major participant to link explicitly in print all four of these pan-movements.
Pan-Kmtyw congresses is the name given to seven international meetings planned by W. E. B. Du Bois between 1919 and 1929, of which four actually materialized, and another meeting in 1945 in which he participated only peripherally in planning and organizing, but over which he presided."
Source - http://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/pan-Kmtyw-congresses (http://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/pan-Kmtyw-congresses)
Keep in mind DuBois rival, Marcus Garvey crowned himself President of Kmt through his government, the head of the "Universal Negro Improvement Association and Kmtyw Community Leagues" whose goal was to "assist in civilizing the backwards tribes of Kmt" and establish a spiritual/Christian confraternity. He even started his own Black Christianity church, "Knights of the Nile", Military. Source Marcus Garvey Papers.
Garvey and DuBois were both Masons, Christians and had HNIC syndrome on steroids.
They ignored indigenous religious-political governments and their systems, language systems, clothing systems. They were talking about eureurasia as a blueprint, not Kemet and Nile Valley pre mulatto-ization.
http://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/pan-Kmtyw-congresses (http://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/pan-Kmtyw-congresses)
Here is the picture of the First Kmtyw Congress program.
(https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9865&thumb=1) (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9865)
Here is pictures of the prevailing attitude of the time - the UNIA's Objects signed off by Marcus Garvey himself. Use Christianity to quote unquote "assist (eureurasiaans) in civilizing the backwards tribes of Kmt." eureurasiaans and Christians civilized, Kmtyws uncivilized - Marcus Garvey.
(https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9868&thumb=1) (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9868)
(https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9867&thumb=1) (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9867)
@Ekwensu007
1st attestation in the 11th dynasty, huh? Here it is in the Pyramid Texts from Volume II of Die Altaegyptischen Pyramidentexte nach den Papierabdrucken und Photographien des Berliner Museums. Ready to stop playing?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9866[/ATTACH]
You can find it here and read it for yourself. Oh, wait... http://www3.lib.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/eos/eos_page.pl?DPI=100&callnum=PJ1553.A1_1908_vol2_cop3&object=486 (http://www3.lib.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/eos/eos_page.pl?DPI=100&callnum=PJ1553.A1_1908_vol2_cop3&object=486)
Attached files (https://www.abibitumi.com/wp-content/uploads/ppMigration/226130=9866-1st%20attestion%20of%20kmtyw-pyramid%20texts%20box.jpg) (https://www.abibitumi.com/wp-content/uploads/ppMigration/226130=9866-1st%20attestion%20of%20kmtyw-pyramid%20texts%20box.jpg)
I provided my sources.
I asked for five specific references to defend what DuBois called a "mulatto race" by the 13th to 17th dynasty. If you can't provide them, then you can't provide them.
#1 We need a reference of "Black People" all going by the same skin color name. a reference needs to be shown of nations of people outside Sema-Tawi and inside Sematawi being called the same name meaning Black people
#2 Reference to Sema (confederation) being based not on controlling the River but on racial consciousness. Show where the ancestors say Sema Tawi occured because of their Black skin.
#3 Reference why the name Kemet was not adopted until several dynasties into Sema-Tawi.
#4 Reference this quote: "The fighting and diplomacy with other Kmtyw=Black civilizations were both to bring in more Kmtyw=Black people and more land of Black people."
"Black civilizations" already had their own lands filled with Black people so
why would Sema-Tawi be fighting with black civilizations who already had lands filled with Blacks. How is that "bringing in more land of Black people." Sema-Tawi also conquered eurasiatics did they not? This makes no sense.
#5 If they were conscious of protecting Black skin, then they had to have had a caste system. Reference their exact color caste (purity) system. Just as in the Americas you have Black, mulatto, griffe, octoroon, mestiza, sambo. If "the main difference" of Sema Tawi was they had such a superior concept of Blackness to the rest of the continent (they did not) reference their caste (color purity) system in detail. Did they have the same "one drop, one parent rule" that white supremacists in America created? As it stands they called everyone who assimilated and paid tribute "remetj" not "Black people" regardless of skin tone or heritage.
Ekwensu007;226131 wrote: I provided my sources.
I asked for five specific references to defend what DuBois called a "mulatto race" by the 13th to 17th dynasty. If you can't provide them, then you can't provide them.
#1 We need a reference of "Black People" all going by the same skin color name. a reference needs to be shown of nations of people outside Sema-Tawi and inside Sematawi being called the same name meaning Black people
#2 Reference to Sema (confederation) being based not on controlling the River but on racial consciousness. Show where the ancestors say Sema Tawi occured because of their Black skin.
#3 Reference why the name Kemet was not adopted until several dynasties into Sema-Tawi.
#4 Reference this quote: "The fighting and diplomacy with other Kmtyw=Black civilizations were both to bring in more Kmtyw=Black people and more land of Black people."
"Black civilizations" already had their own lands filled with Black people so
why would Sema-Tawi be fighting with black civilizations who already had lands filled with Blacks. How is that "bringing in more land of Black people." Sema-Tawi also conquered eurasiatics did they not? This makes no sense.
#5 If they were conscious of protecting Black skin, then they had to have had a caste system. Reference their exact color caste (purity) system. Just as in the Americas you have Black, mulatto, griffe, octoroon, mestiza, sambo. If "the main difference" of Sema Tawi was they had such a superior concept of Blackness to the rest of the continent (they did not) reference their caste (color purity) system in detail. Did they have the same "one drop, one parent rule" that white supremacists in America created? As it stands they called everyone who assimilated and paid tribute "remetj" not "Black people" regardless of skin tone or heritage.
Sorry for the delay. I was checking the University handbook to see where faculty are required to entertain those whose high-schools obviously didn't give out diplomas based on research methodology or critical thinking. I didn't see it in there so...you're S.O.L. until the book drops.
But, I've done you one favor for today, which was to knock down your house of cards regarding the earliest attestation of Kmt(yw). Previously, I gave you a quote from the Autobiography of Weni. I'm 143 pages deep into this so I could keep helping you out but in the future, if you want people to assist you in any sincere quest for knowledge:
1) Try to be a little more humble when requesting information that you lack.
2) Don't piss people off in general -- especially when you are their guest.
3) Avoid pretending to be knowledgeable when you are barely literate and know little to nothing about a subject
4) Try to avoid relying on people who impersonate pseudo-linguists by self-publishing on the internet. It's not a good look.
I could keep giving you instructions, but to keep entertaining you is keeping me from doing my work, which will entail preventing more of you from being created by replacing abject ignorance with knowledge in the form of the words of our Ancestors. :hello:
: Ekwensu007;226129: Dukuzumurenyi;225901What sources did you use to come to conclusion that Kemet was a product of Maat and Sema?* Maat as found all over the continent by Nkoth Bisseck.
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.litenlibassa.com/index.php/culture/tradt/419-mbog-la-cosmovision-Kmtine-universaliste-dans-le-contexte-de-la-mondialisation.html&prev=search (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.litenlibassa.com/index.php/culture/tradt/419-mbog-la-cosmovision-Kmtine-universaliste-dans-le-contexte-de-la-mondialisation.html&prev=search)
* Maat as found in the Kalenjiin/Nandi who say they are a Kemet diaspora military tribe - Kipkoeech Sambu.
Hour long audio: https://imixwhatilike.org/2012/03/09/radicalmaat/ (https://imixwhatilike.org/2012/03/09/radicalmaat/)
"
THE ORIGIN OF THE TERM PAN-Kmtyw
Pan-Kmtyw was coined, it is claimed, by the Trinidadian lawyer Henry Sylvester Williams in an 1899 letter concerning the Pan-Kmtyw Conference of 1900. It appears, however, that Du Bois had a much greater claim to the term. It is plausibly derived from the Pan-Slav, Pan-German, and Pan-American movements, of which the most influential for residents of the Western Hemisphere would logically be the Pan-American movement.
Du Bois is the only major participant to link explicitly in print all four of these pan-movements.
Pan-Kmtyw congresses is the name given to seven international meetings planned by W. E. B. Du Bois between 1919 and 1929, of which four actually materialized, and another meeting in 1945 in which he participated only peripherally in planning and organizing, but over which he presided."
Source - http://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/pan-Kmtyw-congresses (http://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/pan-Kmtyw-congresses)
Keep in mind DuBois rival, Marcus Garvey crowned himself President of Kmt through his government, the head of the "Universal Negro Improvement Association and Kmtyw Community Leagues" whose goal was to "assist in civilizing the backwards tribes of Kmt" and establish a spiritual/Christian confraternity. He even started his own Black Christianity church, "Knights of the Nile", Military. Source Marcus Garvey Papers.
Garvey and DuBois were both Masons, Christians and had HNIC syndrome on steroids.
They ignored indigenous religious-political governments and their systems, language systems, clothing systems. They were talking about eureurasia as a blueprint, not Kemet and Nile Valley pre mulatto-ization.
http://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/pan-Kmtyw-congresses (http://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/applied-and-social-sciences-magazines/pan-Kmtyw-congresses)
Here is the picture of the First Kmtyw Congress program.
(https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9865&thumb=1) (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9865)
Here is pictures of the prevailing attitude of the time - the UNIA's Objects signed off by Marcus Garvey himself. Use Christianity to quote unquote "assist (eureurasiaans) in civilizing the backwards tribes of Kmt." eureurasiaans and Christians civilized, Kmtyws uncivilized - Marcus Garvey.
(https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9868&thumb=1) (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9868)
(https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9867&thumb=1) (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=9867)
So in the era of 1865 to 1900 what would be so unusual about downtrodden subject peoples recognizing the basis of their predicament and organizing themselves in a Pan movement? What is so unusual about Blacks of the era both University and self-educated organizing on the basis of their Kmtyw which meant Black exclusively in that era? Reading Blyden and Delaney and even David Walker can shift the whole discussion.
That online encyclopedia entry such as it is argued loosely with selective info and intending in favor of Dubois while relegating Williams to a writer of one letter as that being his only basis of a claim. It would have to be more detailed in its presentation both in favor of Dubois and in showing why Williams is without merit. It starts there discounting through omission earlier work.
In 1900 West North East South and Central Kmt was embroiled in Wars of resistance with the sea coasts in the hands of invaders. Liberia was in the waning days of the fervor of formerly enslaved Kmtyw returning and it was fighting off eureurasiaan encroachment from all sides all the while also waging intermittent skirmishes with the Kmtyw nations of the Liberian interior. Ethiopia was precariously protecting its sovereignty and all other Kmtyw nations were at various stages in their wars of resistance. Wars which would end their hot phase between 1910-1915 and the last of the flare ups of the last of the last generation to be born in free independent nations would end by 1930. So as they were fighting for survival and as the continent was under siege no wonder they were not in attendance.
I know well Kipkoeech's book. Still doesn't support your contention about the 'founding' of the nation of Kemet. What from Kemet of that period 3200 BCE have you read and drew the interpretation of it being a process of Maat and Sema?
And where did this mulatoization 12-17th Dynasty come from how is it relevant to your claims? Are you focusing on a particular era in the 3000 year history (Diop says conservatively 10000) or are you talking something more in general it's not clear. What is it about the text of Weni that you disagree with its interpretation here? What are you saying that text shows?
How are pictures representative of a prevailing attitude of the period?
Who said their model was ancient in the beginning? Dubois published the Negro in 1915 and continued his progression and a reading of the Garvey papers in 10 volumes shows his progression. Was it really a case of ignoring? How does material in the book Negro With a Hat Fit into what your claiming as well? What was the reception of the UNIA in South Kmt, West Kmt and Kenya? What was the colonial governments implemented policies in response to Garvey?
Someone forgot to tell Dubois's first Univ employers he was a Christian Mason? What was the rationale given by Garvey and the UNIA for establishing the religious component and what did it progress into?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk